Thursday, March 29, 2012

Most new jobs created in the US tend to be low-paying

While the jobs lost are generally higher-paying.  This seems to be confirmed by the monthly US Treasury Tax Receipts, which are lower so far this year despite the seeming improvement in unemployment. Take February 2012, for example, where the Treasury reported $103.4 billion in tax receipts, versus $110.6 billion in February 2011. BLS had unemployment running at 9% in February 2011, versus 8.3% in February 2012.  For every semi-positive data point the bulls have emphasized since the market rally began, there's a counter-point that makes us question what all the fuss is about. The bulls will cite expanding US GDP in late 2011, while the bears can cite US food stamp participation reaching an all-time record of 46,514,238 in December 2011, up 227,922
participantsfrom the month before, and up 6% year-over-year. The bulls can praise February's 15.7% year-over-year increase in US auto sales, while the bears can cite Europe's 9.7% year-over-year decrease in auto sales, led by a 20.2% slump in France. The bulls can exclaim somewhat firmer housing starts in February (as if the US needs more new houses), while the bears can cite the unexpected 100bp drop in the March consumer confidence index, five consecutive months of manufacturing contraction in China, and more recently, a 0.9% drop in US February existing home sales.

3 comments:

  1. Why do you think the corporations are not really engaged in hiring new people? Obamacare? AThe economy? Lack of trust in the government?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. From what I read the Corps can't find qualified workers

      Delete
  2. That's a stretch, with so many unemployed, I find it hard to believe that they cannot find qualified candidates. wonder what the positions are that are so superior to the skills of all American workers?

    ReplyDelete